Plagiat an Leibniz' historiographischem Werk? Rekonstruktion frühmittelalterlicher Adelsgeschichte bei G. W. Leibniz und J. G. Eckhart, 1. Teil
Identifieur interne : 000E12 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 000E11; suivant : 000E13Plagiat an Leibniz' historiographischem Werk? Rekonstruktion frühmittelalterlicher Adelsgeschichte bei G. W. Leibniz und J. G. Eckhart, 1. Teil
Auteurs : Sven Erdner [Allemagne]Source :
- Studia leibnitiana [ 0039-3185 ] ; 2003.
Descripteurs français
- Pascal (Inist)
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
While it is a commonplace even for mathematicians and philosophers that Leibniz was working since 1685 on a Historia Domus for the dukes and electors of Hanover, that what he then actually worked out is much less a topic in the Leibniz research. Therefore, the old claim of Louis Davillé, that Leibniz's amanuensis Johann Georg Eckhart has plagiarized this Historia Domus in his own books, which stands unrefuted since 1911, is a good starting point to examine Leibniz's historical work and method in detail. In this first part I describe the environment in which dynastic history at this time took place and the new aspects which Leibniz introduced into the historical research, especially into medieval prosopography. Further in a first example, I examine Davillé's claim in a comparison between Leibniz and Eckhart on the basis of the deductions of possible descendants of Widukind, the famous rival of Charlemagne, in Leibniz's Annales imperil and Eckhart's Historia genealogica. In a second part I will continue the comparison with two further examples of reconstruction of early medieval nobility.
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream PascalFrancis, to step Corpus: 000047
- to stream PascalFrancis, to step Curation: 000043
- to stream PascalFrancis, to step Checkpoint: 000082
- to stream Main, to step Merge: 000E21
- to stream Main, to step Curation: 000E12
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="GER" level="a">Plagiat an Leibniz' historiographischem Werk? Rekonstruktion frühmittelalterlicher Adelsgeschichte bei G. W. Leibniz und J. G. Eckhart, 1. Teil</title>
<author><name sortKey="Erdner, Sven" sort="Erdner, Sven" uniqKey="Erdner S" first="Sven" last="Erdner">Sven Erdner</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="3"><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Sven Erdner, M. A., Gottfried-Wilhelm-Leibniz-Gesellschaft, Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Bibliothek, Niedersächsische Landesbibliothek, Waterloostr. 8</s1>
<s2>30169 Hannover</s2>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>Allemagne</country>
<placeName><region type="land" nuts="2">Basse-Saxe</region>
<settlement type="city">Hanovre</settlement>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">519-07-13512</idno>
<date when="2003">2003</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">FRANCIS 519-07-13512 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Francis:519-07-13512</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000047</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Curation">000043</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Checkpoint">000082</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PascalFrancis" wicri:step="Checkpoint">000082</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0039-3185:2003:Erdner S:plagiat:an:leibniz</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">000E21</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">000E12</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">000E12</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="GER" level="a">Plagiat an Leibniz' historiographischem Werk? Rekonstruktion frühmittelalterlicher Adelsgeschichte bei G. W. Leibniz und J. G. Eckhart, 1. Teil</title>
<author><name sortKey="Erdner, Sven" sort="Erdner, Sven" uniqKey="Erdner S" first="Sven" last="Erdner">Sven Erdner</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="3"><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Sven Erdner, M. A., Gottfried-Wilhelm-Leibniz-Gesellschaft, Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Bibliothek, Niedersächsische Landesbibliothek, Waterloostr. 8</s1>
<s2>30169 Hannover</s2>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>Allemagne</country>
<placeName><region type="land" nuts="2">Basse-Saxe</region>
<settlement type="city">Hanovre</settlement>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Studia leibnitiana</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Stud. leibnitiana</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0039-3185</idno>
<imprint><date when="2003">2003</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Studia leibnitiana</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Stud. leibnitiana</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0039-3185</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Century 17-18</term>
<term>Leibniz (G. W.)</term>
<term>Philosophy history</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Histoire de la philosophie</term>
<term>Siècle 17-18</term>
<term>Leibniz (G. W.)</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">While it is a commonplace even for mathematicians and philosophers that Leibniz was working since 1685 on a Historia Domus for the dukes and electors of Hanover, that what he then actually worked out is much less a topic in the Leibniz research. Therefore, the old claim of Louis Davillé, that Leibniz's amanuensis Johann Georg Eckhart has plagiarized this Historia Domus in his own books, which stands unrefuted since 1911, is a good starting point to examine Leibniz's historical work and method in detail. In this first part I describe the environment in which dynastic history at this time took place and the new aspects which Leibniz introduced into the historical research, especially into medieval prosopography. Further in a first example, I examine Davillé's claim in a comparison between Leibniz and Eckhart on the basis of the deductions of possible descendants of Widukind, the famous rival of Charlemagne, in Leibniz's Annales imperil and Eckhart's Historia genealogica. In a second part I will continue the comparison with two further examples of reconstruction of early medieval nobility.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<affiliations><list><country><li>Allemagne</li>
</country>
<region><li>Basse-Saxe</li>
</region>
<settlement><li>Hanovre</li>
</settlement>
</list>
<tree><country name="Allemagne"><region name="Basse-Saxe"><name sortKey="Erdner, Sven" sort="Erdner, Sven" uniqKey="Erdner S" first="Sven" last="Erdner">Sven Erdner</name>
</region>
</country>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/ChansonRoland/explor/ChansonRolandV7/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000E12 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 000E12 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= ChansonRoland |area= ChansonRolandV7 |flux= Main |étape= Exploration |type= RBID |clé= Francis:519-07-13512 |texte= Plagiat an Leibniz' historiographischem Werk? Rekonstruktion frühmittelalterlicher Adelsgeschichte bei G. W. Leibniz und J. G. Eckhart, 1. Teil }}
This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.39. |